Paul Hackett (at left, with a UAW member, from his Flickr.com site) is a Marine, Iraq War veteran and outspoken Democratic candidate who challenged Republican Jean Schmidt in 2005 for an open Congressional seat in southwestern Ohio. Hackett started at a huge disadvantage in terms of funding and name recognition, and also was challenging a well-known Republican in a district that Warantless Wiretapper had won by a sizable margin (at least according to the pro-GOP Diebold's machines) in 2004. Hackett even had the chutzpah to call out the Warantless Wiretapper on his disastrous management of Iraqmire before the election.It wasn't suprising, therefore, that Hackett ended up losing to the nutty Schmidt, who managed to distinguish herself later in 2005 when, wearing a US flag sweater and tilting to her side like the Tower of Pisa, she viciously attacked the patriotism of Democrat and war-veteran Rep. John Murtha (PA) on the floor of the House. (SNL's Rachel Dratch lampooned the episode last fall, as the photo below right shows.) But what was surprising is that Hackett lost by only a small margin (or at least according to the Diebold machines).
Hackett is back, again challenging a Republican for a high profile seat. He has tossed his buzzcut into the ring to vie for the Democratic ticket that will face incumbent Ohio Republican Senator Mike DeWine. I can remember when Ohio had two moderate-to-liberal Democrats representing it, astronaut John Glenn and Howard Metzenbaum, but since their retirement in the 1990s, Ohio has seated two moderate-to-right Republicans (the other being George Voinovich, the state's former governor, who broke into tears at the thought of mustering the courage to denounce recess-appointee UN Ambassador and wacko John Bolton). DeWine is moderate only in comparison with the extremist elements in his party, and in general, he tends to vote along party lines. His current favorability ratings aren't good, his party is embroiled in a range of scandals both in Ohio (the ethics, Noe rare coin and money laundering scandals) and in Washington (Abramoff, DeLay, Plamegate, NSA warrantless wiretapping, etc.), and he is hardly what you'd call charismatic. In addition, he had his own brush with scandal when one of his staffers, "Washingtonienne" (also known as Jessica Cutler) admitted that she was screwing all kinds of high profile men in Washington. Not that that's a big deal, except that she was working for a "family values" Republican!Hackett actually has to defeat Sherrod Brown, a Democratic Congressman with a decent record, in the primaries, in order to face DeWine. I believe current polls show Brown with a slight lead over Hackett, and with a lead over DeWine. But Hackett appeals to me a lot more because he regularly speaks with utter candor and says the sorts of things that Democrats should be saying. And he doesn't back down. (He's a Marine, after all.) Such as when he called Warrantless Wiretapper a "coward" before the election against Schmidt. Or like now, where he basically says what most Democrats, and far too many Republicans, pussyfoot around: that the radical right-wing GOP extremists are extremists.
The Republican Party has been hijacked by the religious fanatics that, in my opinion, aren't a whole lot different than Osama bin Laden and a lot of the other religious nuts around the world," he said. "The challenge is for the rest of us moderate Americans and citizens of the world to put down the fork and spoon, turn off the TV, and participate in the process and try to push back on these radical nuts - and they are nuts."
Naturally, this sent the Ohio GOP (which actually has a road show happening right now in which one nutcase compares our democracy and the separation between Church and State to Nazi Germany) into a tizzy. But did Hackett cower and simper and apologize? As Usher might say, "Hell no!" Instead, this was his response:
I said it. I meant it. I stand behind it. Equal justice under the law for all regardless of who they are and how they were born is fundamental to our American spirit and our American freedoms. Any person or group that argues that the law should not apply equally to all Americans is, frankly, un-American.The Republican Party has been hijacked by religious fanatics, who are out of touch with mainstream America. Think of the recent comments by Pat Robertson - a religious fanatic by any measure - that the United States should assassinate a democratically elected leader in Venezuela, and that Ariel Sharon's stroke was divine punishment because Sharon wished to trade land for peace."
Since the Republican Party has been utterly unable to stand for something positive, they have created an atmosphere of fear and intimidation, and have pandered to religious fanatics not to vote for something they believe in, but to vote against their fellow Americans with whom they disagree. Those among us who would use religion and politics to divide rather than unite Americans should be ashamed.
Tell it, Paul Hackett! Why oh why can't more Democrats be this frank and forthright? I admit that in my scheme of things, I rarely come across people who think that Pat Robertson is a sane person, but I am willing to venture that the majority of people out there do not. And I don't just mean in the Blue states. This man is certifiable. His own wife even said years ago that
Pat, I've tried to adjust to this 'saved' jag you're on, but you've become a fanatic. All you do is read that Bible all day and sit around and talk to Jesus. I'm a nurse. I recognize schizoid tendencies when I see them, and I think you're sick. It's just not normal for a man to walk out on his wife and leave her with a small child when she's expecting a baby any minute -- while he goes off into the woods to talk to God. God doesn't tell people to do things like that. At least, my God doesn't. (Quote via PositiveAtheist.com)
I've already sent Hackett one donation, and I think I'll contribute something more soon. I want to see him in the Senate, especially if the Democrats win it back. The Warrantless Wiretapper will spend his final two years wishing he had never gotten his gang (including Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts) to mob the 2000 election from Al Gore.
***
From AFP, via AmericaBlog:
What we do know about that pervasive wiretapping virtually compels the conclusion that the president of the United States has been breaking the law repeatedly and consistently," Gore said during an event honoring Martin Luther King Jr. here.
Speaking on the US public holiday honoring the slain civil rights hero, the former vice president noted that King was himseld the target of secret FBI wiretaps for several years.
"It is especially important to recall that for the last several years of his life, Doctor King was illegally wiretapped, one of the hundred of thousands of Americans whose private communications were intercepted by the US governement during that period," Gore said....
"Just one month ago, Americans awoke to the shocking news that in spite of this long settled law the executive branch has been secretly spying on large numbers of Americans for the last four years," Gore said.
Gore called for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate "what many believe are serious violations".
Naturally, the Warrantless Wiretapper's administration responded with lies and claimed that Gore was a hypocrite because Bill Clinton had done it so that was excuse enough. (Only Clinton hadn't authorized warrantless wiretaps after the change in the law, as has been pointed out in numerous fact-based journalistic organs.) So Gore responded within a day, breaking it down for the liars:
There are two problems with the Attorney General's effort to focus attention on the past instead of the present Administration's behavior. First, as others have thoroughly documented, his charges are factually wrong. Both before and after the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was amended in 1995, the Clinton/Gore Administration complied fully and completely with the terms of the law.
Second, the Attorney General's attempt to cite a previous administration's activity as precedent for theirs - even though factually wrong - ironically demonstrates another reason why we must be so vigilant about their brazen disregard for the law. If unchecked, their behavior would serve as a precedent to encourage future presidents to claim these same powers, which many legal experts in both parties believe are clearly illegal.
The issue, simply put, is that for more than four years, the executive branch has been wiretapping many thousands of American citizens without warrants in direct contradiction of American law. It is clearly wrong and disrespectful to the American people to allow a close political associate of the president to be in charge of reviewing serious charges against him.
The country needs a full and independent investigation into the facts and legality of the present Administration's program.
We all know, they don't want that....
***
MyDD quotes the new Governor Corzine: As to how far he'll get given the entrenched power structure, it remains to be seen, but he's making it quite clear that he's not in office to play footsy as the previous, DL Democrat (also known as James McGreevey) did. I can only imagine that it made the GOP--the less moderate among them--retch, because the better Corzine turns out to be, the more other Democrats in the Garden State will benefit.
What we need is not a new day of reform, but a new era. An era where working with or serving in New Jersey state government is not viewed as a chance to make a deal, but as an opportunity to make a difference. A way to enrich, not the well connected, but the lives of our children, our working families, our veterans, and retirees. Public integrity is not just about reputation or principles, as important as each is. What's at stake is social justice and fiscal responsibility. Every dollar squandered in violation of the public trust is a book not bought for a classroom, a prescription drug with a higher co-pay, meals-on-wheels not delivered, a road or science lab not built. With a multi-billion dollar structural deficit, mismanagement and misappropriation cannot and will not be tolerated.
A more conservative Democrat but consummate showman, Governor Rod Blagojevich (at right, looking like a bashful 9th grader), gave his Illinois State of the State address today. He managed to make it seem like the Prairie State was approaching a state of true perfection on every level, or close to it, but then Blago has never lacked for the Barnum & Bailey touch. He promised so much, particular to middle-class voters, that it seemed as if he were reading off a wish list that was being whispered into his ear. He also was touting Keno gambling as if it were best pick-you-up since Viagra. I particularly like how he channels John F. Kennedy in his self-presentation and perorations, which have the effect of both being stirring at times and sounding a bit...phony. I don't even he buys all the crap he says, but he knows how to package it. His best lines, I thought, came when he defended women's reproductive rights, and threw down the gantlet to any Republicans (or Democrats or anyone else) who'd attempt to pass greater restrictions not only on access to abortion and reproductive services, but to contraceptives. Last year, in response to a "religious objector" pharmacists who refused to fill day-after pill prescriptions, Blago issued an executive order requiring them to do so. The post-speech commentary by Republicans that I heard was, as always, very negative and dismissive; Blago burns them up. Yet while his popularity has tanked a bit as a result of allegations of corruption (this is Illinois, after all), he laid out an agenda that ought to appeal quite well to the suburbs ringing Chicago, which, with the city, constitute the major population center of the state.
***
